Yeah, you are right, its possible, but not too probable…but you are right that their atty’s will use that argument to cast reasonable doubt on murder…I mean, the penalty for burning a body is a lot different than murder…so maybe they will try to make the burning of the body the only thing they are guilty of…they might say, “hey, we found her in her room, she was dead, we freaked, we were scared, we burned her….”

Somehow I dont see how that will fly, especially with the other evidence, but juries are unpredictable…

How you been, anyway?

d*

And I mean a slight chance.

yup I am with you. I am so suprised they are still sticking together on this one. Not sure why that it but drug addicts are inharently selfish so I suspect there is something in it for both of them by sticking together. Just my opinion.

Your so dead on with that post! I agree with you! Even though they probably did it, they very well could get off! Plus, there’s a ton of stuff that will come out that will shock everyone on this board….I agree with the OJ take! He carved 2 people to death with DNA to boot. And got set free.

Chain..

You are correct as well.Sometimes too much evidence as shock said
can be beneficial to the defense. Which could play in the defense deck of cards!

OTFC..

You have valid takes as well! We’ll have to see? If this trial ever gets started…my god!!!!!!!!!!!! *yawn*

P

Ineptitude has set more people free than you can shake a stick at. OJ is the most famous case, but there are many others. Sure, they have had two years, but they have not been copious within those two years - working nonstop to see that no stone is left unturned.

The evidence can be overwhelming - look at OJ’s DNA/ blood evidence and the timeline. CT and KR have this same kind of issue: It’s her car, their tazer and tazer dot timelines, and their admission to friends who gave grand jury testimony to that effect.

I don’t believe, quite frankly, that Cristalli, et. al. are saying “Quit saying you are innocent, throw me a bone.” I think they have told them to hold out and have repeatedly said, “Don’t worry buddy, we’ll get you off like we have so many others like you…”

No defense attorney pleads with his client to plead guilty - look back on the Danielle Van Dam case - the person accused, (david westerfield), and eventually convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering a child, was known to his attorney throughout the entire case as the killer - but he argued anyway. That only came out after the trial.

These defense attorneys are a different breed, man. Not at all like a prosecutor.

Just my two cents, but I think that Tomsheck has his work cut out for him - CT’s and KR’s attorneys are about as slimey as the two of them.

Ineptitude has set more people free than you can shake a stick at. OJ is the most famous case, but there are many others. Sure, they have had two years, but they have not been copious within those two years - working nonstop to see that no stone is left unturned.

The evidence can be overwhelming - look at OJ’s DNA/ blood evidence and the timeline. CT and KR have this same kind of issue: It’s her car, their tazer and tazer dot timelines, and their admission to friends who gave grand jury testimony to that effect.

I don’t believe, quite frankly, that Cristalli, et. al. are saying “Quit saying you are innocent, throw me a bone.” I think they have told them to hold out and have repeatedly said, “Don’t worry buddy, we’ll get you off like we have so many others like you…”

No defense attorney pleads with his client to plead guilty - look back on the Danielle Van Dam case - the person accused, and eventually convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering a child, was known to his attorney throughout the entire case as the killer - but he argued anyway. That only came out after the trial.

These defense attorneys are a different breed, man. Not at all like a prosecutor.

Just my two cents, but I think that Tomsheck has his work cut out for him - CT’s and KR’s attorneys are about as slimey as the two of them.