Backing up for just a second, the not guilty verdict in the Binion retrial got much of its traction from the Nevada Supreme Court ruling that overturned the murder convictions of Tabish and Murphy, not to mention that having a second go at the case, knowing the mistakes that had been made in the first case, made it a lot easier to defend. The first trial was completely screwed up by the defense. They were horrible. Any idiot could have retried that case the second time and gotten an acquittal. Frankly they should have been acquitted the first time.

So, I dont think Daskas has much by way of a rivalry here…

Secondly, while Daskas may have negotiated the resentencing of Cassim, the judge had to put the stamp of approval on it, not Daskas. The person you should be looking at is Judge Bonaventure, who ironically was the judge in both Binion trials.

Remember also that CT has not been charged with the conspiracy to murder the witnesses. Show me a way that the defense will bring that into the murder trial…why would they bring up something that CT has not been charged with? The DA would have a field day with that. It will not come in to the case in chief.

That is why CT hasnt been charged…it aint coming in…

d*

Consider this, in any prosecutorial case that involves a conspiracy there must be a conspirator AND conspirators. The law states that THESE are the ones to be prosecuted. THE CRIME IS, “TO SET IN MOTION A CRIMINAL SCHEME AND INVOLVE OTHERS.” In this case DA Daskas, and or the police investigators, went to the informant Cassim, (or visa versa) and set this scheme in motion. Is there any doubt that Cassim was an agent of the authorities (DA or Police) when he made over 100 recorded telephone calls from the jail to Brady?? That being the case, the authirities threatened Brady with bodily harm into breaking the law and then prosecute him for breaking the law they induced him to break. The function of law enforcement does not include the MANUFACTORING of a crime. A different question is presented when the criminal design originates with the officials of government.

If it had been Brady who went to Cassim to set this plan into motion, why is Cassim threating Brady, (or “acting tough” with Brady as Cassim states in the Las Vegas Review Journal 02/20/06) to go through with this murder-for-hire scheme?? If it had been Brady who started this plot, it would have been Brady threating Cassim??

DA Daskas. Was it DA Daskas who was the lead prosecutor in the Rick Tabish/Sandra Murphy re-trial who lost this re-trial to the law firm of Cristalli & Saggese? It is DA Daskas who is prosecutor in the Titus/Ryan murder case and again Cristalli & Saggese who are defending Titus & Ryan?? Any rivalry here?? Would DA Daskas “cross the line” to assure himself of a win at this trial since the last one with Cristalli & Saggese was lost. That was an embarrassing trial to loose for Daskas.

Now, DA Daskas is prosecuting Titus/Ryan for alleged murder and Brady for murder-for-hire. Did you know that it was DA Daskas himself who negotiated Cassim’s “re-sentencing” and release from a 12 year prision sentence directly with Judge Joe Bonaventure in chambers on May 23, 2006?? How convenient.

Is it possiable that it was the same police detectives who investigated and arrested Titus and Ryan and are the same police detectives who investigated (the Brady set-up ) and arrested Brady for the alleged murder-for-hire scheme??? My guess is that we fill find this too, to be true.

I feel sorry for Cassim as he is trying very hard to be “a hero” in this case. The only thing that would help him is to take the true story to Brady’s or Titus attorney. A true story that matches the evidence is the only way he would “look good.”

DA Daskas will NEVER allow Cassim to testify in this case. He will cause or create delay’s until the last minute and then “dismiss” the case because Cassim will be a no show. The sad thing about this is that Daskas knowes this and still allows Brady to sit in solitary confinement. This adds to his crime.

I think you could be right. No wonder Cassim is in London. If he was gonna testify for anyone, they probably wouldn’t have deported him, which I’m sure is what they had done.

I wonder what the impqct might be on the murder trial.

I can appreciate you’re research, I heard the same thing listening to these tapes. All Daskas did was let a criminal go, and I hope he is deported for good. Better they have him in England to deal with than here.

In carefully listening to these conversations and comparing the statements and language (words) used I believe you will understand what you hear.

Informant Cassim was the “driving force in murder-for-hire probe.” (RJ 12/17/06) Cassim threatened Brady and his family with bodily harm and death. Now Cassim says, “he did not threaten Brady but did act tough with him at the time.” Listen to these tapes! Since when do you have to threaten a man, (Brady) in order to make him go through with a murder-for-hire plot IF that plot was Brady’s plot (idea) in the first place?? And aren’t the police and DA sitting right there with Cassim during these conversations or was Cassim provided a private phone in his jail cell?

Brady, Cassim and Titus NEVER use the word “Murder” in any conversation. It does appear to me that Titus and Brady did have some type of a code, however, this “code” appears to be related to working with the police narcotics officers. The hedline above, “Titus targets witnesses’ credibility,” is referring to drug sales and use by witnesses’ Consider the statement made by Titus in tape #9 of the Review Journal talking about his daughter, the witnesses in question and the use and sale of drugs. Titus says, “we won’t even have to publish a book. You know these guys can take care of everything dude, JUST BY ARRESTING THESE PEOPLE BRO.”

This is becoming scary. Cassim said, “Clark County Prosecutor Robert Daskas did not want to resentence him after his cooperation with police.” Now its “DASKAS” who is prosecuting Titus and Brady while letting Cassim scate form a 12 year prison sentence?? Sounds to me like DA Daskas is orchestrating all of the action in these cases. What about Cassim being on probation and in London?? That just cannot be possible.

Here is my last one for now. Cassim says, “He (Brady) was given my name by another friend because he (Brady) was looking for sombody to do a job that required POSSIBLE WITNESS INTIMIDATION and more IF needed.” POSSIBLE WITNESS INTIMIDATION??? I thaught this was a murder-for-hire plot???

They are in the Member area and you will need to join first in order to listen to them. Membership is free.