Warning: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 2 to be array, null given in /usr/www/virtual/liftstudios/www.titusandryan.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 1003

WordPress database error: [Table './candr/wp_comments' is marked as crashed and should be repaired]
SELECT ID, COUNT( comment_ID ) AS ccount FROM wp_posts LEFT JOIN wp_comments ON ( comment_post_ID = ID AND comment_approved = '1') WHERE ID IN (331) GROUP BY ID

Craig Titus & Kelly Ryan Investigation » Blog Archive » Titus had a lot of money in order to shut up Mr. Daskas?

Titus had a lot of money in order to shut up Mr. Daskas?

Notes from the 02/01/2007 court appearance. A few interesting tidbits in bold below:

Mr. Saggese advised he filed an Opposition at 3:00 p.m. on January 30. Court noted it has not received the Opposition. Mr. Saggese argued the State’s motion is premature as this Court gave the defense until the 23rd to determine whether or not they will be requesting a continuance. Further advised, he is in the process of getting more money from different sources but that has not happened yet. Court DIRECTED Mr. Saggese to file and serve a written motion for fees to be heard on 2/23/07 if he intends to request the Court for assistance. Response by Mr. Saggese that he believes the request for fees should be done ex parte and the State should not be involved. Mr. Denue joined in Mr. Saggese’s argument that the instant motion is premature. Mr. Daskas expressed concern regarding defendants’ request to have the tax payers pay for the defense. Mr. Tomsheck moved to file the State’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Control Prejudicial Pre-Trial Publicity and for a Restraining Order Regarding Extrajudicial Statements in open court and the COURT SO ORDERED. Further, and in support of the State’s Motion to Control Pre-Trial Publicity, Mr. Tomsheck stated that in Mr. Saggese’s Opposition, Mr. Saggese states the information the State has is a ruse and the defense created a fabrication. Mr. Saggese stated he advised deft. Titus to say he had a lot of money in order to shut up Mr. Daskas knowing the State was intercepting the jail phone calls. Mr. Daskas stated he has never made any comments. Court noted Mr. Saggese is the only one doing the talking in this case and it is disingenuous of him to suggest that he may not get a fair trial. FURTHER, this Court will take plenty of time to insure a fair jury is impaneled. COURT FURTHER ORDERED, instant motion and Motion to Control Pre-Trial Publicity CONTINUED.

CONTINUED TO: 2/23/07 9:00 AM

WordPress database error: [Table './candr/wp_comments' is marked as crashed and should be repaired]
SELECT * FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = '331' AND comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date

Leave a Reply