<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence</title>
	<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/</link>
	<description>Ongoing news as it becomes available related to the murder of Melissa James.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 07:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: chainsaw</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-8174</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-8174</guid>
					<description>Jason and d*:

Usually they split people up in jails by Gang, Sexual Orientation, Health and Psychological probems and that is it.  Once you get into you're dorm, &quot;you're people&quot; approach you, and &quot;you're people&quot; segregate you by race.  Usually they only seperate people that are high profile into their own cell.  CT does not qualify for that status at this time.  Since the prisoners usually are not convicted of a crime, just waiting for trial, they don't seperate them by offense.

The above description is how it is in L.A County.  Not sure about CCDC, but I'm assuming that it is the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jason and d*:</p>
	<p>Usually they split people up in jails by Gang, Sexual Orientation, Health and Psychological probems and that is it.  Once you get into you&#8217;re dorm, &#8220;you&#8217;re people&#8221; approach you, and &#8220;you&#8217;re people&#8221; segregate you by race.  Usually they only seperate people that are high profile into their own cell.  CT does not qualify for that status at this time.  Since the prisoners usually are not convicted of a crime, just waiting for trial, they don&#8217;t seperate them by offense.</p>
	<p>The above description is how it is in L.A County.  Not sure about CCDC, but I&#8217;m assuming that it is the same.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Jason G</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-8084</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-8084</guid>
					<description>I am going to find someone to ask some questions. I may try to call the jail. Somebody must know the jail srtucture. And now that there are two (2) &quot;snitches&quot; there has to be a conection of some kind or at the least a reason Cassim, and now Darrin are comming forward with all of these last minute &quot;revaluations&quot;. This whole thing is intriguing to me and I need to find some answers so I can speak intelligently. Mark my words, there is something still missing and I believe it could be big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am going to find someone to ask some questions. I may try to call the jail. Somebody must know the jail srtucture. And now that there are two (2) &#8220;snitches&#8221; there has to be a conection of some kind or at the least a reason Cassim, and now Darrin are comming forward with all of these last minute &#8220;revaluations&#8221;. This whole thing is intriguing to me and I need to find some answers so I can speak intelligently. Mark my words, there is something still missing and I believe it could be big.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: darkstar</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-8026</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 08:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-8026</guid>
					<description>Jason,

I dont know the specifics of who gets housed with who, but I do know that when you are first arrested, like in Vegas, you go downtown to Clark Detention until you bail or until your case is adjudicated. There may be some separation between crimes, like felonies and mis, but with the jail being so overcrowded, they probably just shove you in and tell you to find a spot...&quot;hey, youre craig titus, man...&quot;  

Cassim should have been getting ready be transferred to a state prison, since anything over a year sentence typically doesnt stay at the county jail...

The rest, hell if I know. You are right, there are some details that would clear up some of the murkiness, however, in the big picture, these guys were talking about the plan...it would be interesting to know where they were all situated, but the bottom line is that they got some interesting conversations recorded on the jail telephones...

d*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jason,</p>
	<p>I dont know the specifics of who gets housed with who, but I do know that when you are first arrested, like in Vegas, you go downtown to Clark Detention until you bail or until your case is adjudicated. There may be some separation between crimes, like felonies and mis, but with the jail being so overcrowded, they probably just shove you in and tell you to find a spot&#8230;&#8221;hey, youre craig titus, man&#8230;&#8221;  </p>
	<p>Cassim should have been getting ready be transferred to a state prison, since anything over a year sentence typically doesnt stay at the county jail&#8230;</p>
	<p>The rest, hell if I know. You are right, there are some details that would clear up some of the murkiness, however, in the big picture, these guys were talking about the plan&#8230;it would be interesting to know where they were all situated, but the bottom line is that they got some interesting conversations recorded on the jail telephones&#8230;</p>
	<p>d*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Jason G</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-8022</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 08:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-8022</guid>
					<description>Ok, this is one of my questions. Brady a &quot;two bit crook&quot;??, Cassim a convicted felon and Titus jailed for murder. Don't they seperate the felony and misdemeanor prisoners? What was Brady jailed for when he was with Tison? Does anyone know the jail structure? I am just very suspicious of the series of events that lead up to the &quot;murder for hire&quot; plot. There must be more to this than we are being told.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ok, this is one of my questions. Brady a &#8220;two bit crook&#8221;??, Cassim a convicted felon and Titus jailed for murder. Don&#8217;t they seperate the felony and misdemeanor prisoners? What was Brady jailed for when he was with Tison? Does anyone know the jail structure? I am just very suspicious of the series of events that lead up to the &#8220;murder for hire&#8221; plot. There must be more to this than we are being told.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: darkstar</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7957</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7957</guid>
					<description>Jason,

Not sure I still understand what your question is, but perhaps the reason Cassim went through Brady was probably because Cassim was a convicted felon, and probably could not get access to visit inmates at the jail...Brady was a lot lower on the perp scale being a two bit crook and a nobody, so no one would pay much attention to him...except for those pesky recorded jail phones...

Besides, we dont know who cooked up this plot originally, except that Brady, Cassim, and arguably CT are co-conspirators, with Cassim getting a pass to set it up for the police...

Why the rush to charge CT with it? Charging him doesnt really change anything...he is in jail anyway, and those charges can be added anytime...plus, the witnesses arent in danger...Brady is in jail, CT is in jail, and the alleged hit man was an undercover cop!...the DA has charged Brady with it, and I would look for the DA to squeeze Brady to get him to spill the beans about CT's involvement in it...in any case, Brady is in hot water with the charge against him, and the DA knows it...so does Brady...As I said before, Brady is a two bit small time wannabe crook, and he has just graduated to felony school...quite a career path, eh??

d*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jason,</p>
	<p>Not sure I still understand what your question is, but perhaps the reason Cassim went through Brady was probably because Cassim was a convicted felon, and probably could not get access to visit inmates at the jail&#8230;Brady was a lot lower on the perp scale being a two bit crook and a nobody, so no one would pay much attention to him&#8230;except for those pesky recorded jail phones&#8230;</p>
	<p>Besides, we dont know who cooked up this plot originally, except that Brady, Cassim, and arguably CT are co-conspirators, with Cassim getting a pass to set it up for the police&#8230;</p>
	<p>Why the rush to charge CT with it? Charging him doesnt really change anything&#8230;he is in jail anyway, and those charges can be added anytime&#8230;plus, the witnesses arent in danger&#8230;Brady is in jail, CT is in jail, and the alleged hit man was an undercover cop!&#8230;the DA has charged Brady with it, and I would look for the DA to squeeze Brady to get him to spill the beans about CT&#8217;s involvement in it&#8230;in any case, Brady is in hot water with the charge against him, and the DA knows it&#8230;so does Brady&#8230;As I said before, Brady is a two bit small time wannabe crook, and he has just graduated to felony school&#8230;quite a career path, eh??</p>
	<p>d*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Jason G</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7902</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 08:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7902</guid>
					<description>I just can't understand Cassim making this &quot;plot&quot; directly with Brady since they (Titus, Cassim &amp;#38; Brady) were all in jail together. Had it been me, I would have made my plans directly with Titus. Why the third party? And, &quot;IF&quot; the DA has the evedience on Titus I believe that he would have charged him by now. As I have stated before, this &quot;Murder for Hire Plot&quot; has to scare the !!!! out of these witnesses. I am suspicious of statments made by any party which creates headlines such as those created in this case. Give me the facts, not accusations'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I just can&#8217;t understand Cassim making this &#8220;plot&#8221; directly with Brady since they (Titus, Cassim &amp; Brady) were all in jail together. Had it been me, I would have made my plans directly with Titus. Why the third party? And, &#8220;IF&#8221; the DA has the evedience on Titus I believe that he would have charged him by now. As I have stated before, this &#8220;Murder for Hire Plot&#8221; has to scare the !!!! out of these witnesses. I am suspicious of statments made by any party which creates headlines such as those created in this case. Give me the facts, not accusations&#8217;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Annonymous#2</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7799</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7799</guid>
					<description>I am curious myself as to what you mean about &quot;Brady&quot; being chosen? Daily, something new is unfolding, but there are still these pieces that I am having a hard time putting together. Did they say both trial's were pushed back. or just KR? 
And, as far as the 99.9%...I just don't honestly see that in this particular case. I guess it is hard enough to determine what is said between the media and what the actual facts are, but something is just missing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am curious myself as to what you mean about &#8220;Brady&#8221; being chosen? Daily, something new is unfolding, but there are still these pieces that I am having a hard time putting together. Did they say both trial&#8217;s were pushed back. or just KR?<br />
And, as far as the 99.9%&#8230;I just don&#8217;t honestly see that in this particular case. I guess it is hard enough to determine what is said between the media and what the actual facts are, but something is just missing?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: darkstar</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7765</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7765</guid>
					<description>Jason,

Can you explain what you mean by Cassim picked Brady over CT, etc...

If I understand you correctly, are you wondering why Cassim pegged Brady to be the messenger or go between between CT and the undercover cops..?

Thanx

d*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jason,</p>
	<p>Can you explain what you mean by Cassim picked Brady over CT, etc&#8230;</p>
	<p>If I understand you correctly, are you wondering why Cassim pegged Brady to be the messenger or go between between CT and the undercover cops..?</p>
	<p>Thanx</p>
	<p>d*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Jason G</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7750</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7750</guid>
					<description>99.9% may be an exaggeration, my point being that most police personal are good, fair and dedicated to public safety doing honest police work. This &quot;I&quot; found to be the case where ever I was living.

This case with Titus, Brady and Cassim just doesn't ring true. There are obviously many pieces to this case we do not know at this time. It could be just good police work or maby not. I just do not believe that the DA has the evidence he needs. I just can't figure out why Cassim picked Brady and not Titus or both Brady and Titus. They were all together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>99.9% may be an exaggeration, my point being that most police personal are good, fair and dedicated to public safety doing honest police work. This &#8220;I&#8221; found to be the case where ever I was living.</p>
	<p>This case with Titus, Brady and Cassim just doesn&#8217;t ring true. There are obviously many pieces to this case we do not know at this time. It could be just good police work or maby not. I just do not believe that the DA has the evidence he needs. I just can&#8217;t figure out why Cassim picked Brady and not Titus or both Brady and Titus. They were all together.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: darkstar</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7743</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 04:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7743</guid>
					<description>Jason,

There is no convoluted set up by the cops against Brady or CT...These are a couple of, dare I say it, dum fux who think they are smarter than everyone else (first mistake) and secondly, think that the law doesnt apply to them...
The proof that they are wrong is that they are both sitting on their sorry asses in the Clark County jail on non trivial felony charges...

d*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jason,</p>
	<p>There is no convoluted set up by the cops against Brady or CT&#8230;These are a couple of, dare I say it, dum fux who think they are smarter than everyone else (first mistake) and secondly, think that the law doesnt apply to them&#8230;<br />
The proof that they are wrong is that they are both sitting on their sorry asses in the Clark County jail on non trivial felony charges&#8230;</p>
	<p>d*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: KNEW THEM</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7732</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7732</guid>
					<description>Jason G.     99.9%  of POLICE?????????   Where do you live.....because I need to move there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jason G.     99.9%  of POLICE?????????   Where do you live&#8230;..because I need to move there!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: darkstar</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7689</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7689</guid>
					<description>The key here is &quot;trying to separate&quot; the trials...this is not an automatic, and Im sure there will be even more delays while this is haggled over...

Im not sure there are too many mysteries about Brady getting the chance to post bail. If the typical bail is 9K, and he got 150K, that is a substantial increase, and he still has to come up with the up front for the bail bond.

The 8th amendment disallows excessive bail, so given the circumstances, it's probably reasonable, and again, just because Brady was granted bail doesnt mean he can pony up the 20 or 30K he will need to post to walk out of jail...

The time spans between the onset of the conspiracy to Brady's arrest arent so critical in my opinion, because the cops were watching this all unfold. They knew where Brady et al were all the time...

All this talk by the DA and other attorneys about &quot;danger to society&quot; and &quot;shocked, never heard of this happening before&quot; is all lawyer jockeying, and doesnt mean squat. It might make for a good story, but thats about it...


d*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The key here is &#8220;trying to separate&#8221; the trials&#8230;this is not an automatic, and Im sure there will be even more delays while this is haggled over&#8230;</p>
	<p>Im not sure there are too many mysteries about Brady getting the chance to post bail. If the typical bail is 9K, and he got 150K, that is a substantial increase, and he still has to come up with the up front for the bail bond.</p>
	<p>The 8th amendment disallows excessive bail, so given the circumstances, it&#8217;s probably reasonable, and again, just because Brady was granted bail doesnt mean he can pony up the 20 or 30K he will need to post to walk out of jail&#8230;</p>
	<p>The time spans between the onset of the conspiracy to Brady&#8217;s arrest arent so critical in my opinion, because the cops were watching this all unfold. They knew where Brady et al were all the time&#8230;</p>
	<p>All this talk by the DA and other attorneys about &#8220;danger to society&#8221; and &#8220;shocked, never heard of this happening before&#8221; is all lawyer jockeying, and doesnt mean squat. It might make for a good story, but thats about it&#8230;</p>
	<p>d*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Chainsaw</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7686</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7686</guid>
					<description>I have a funny feeling that as soon as KR gets her trial separated from CT's trial, they will then tack on to CT the conspiracy.  I believe that they were using this potential conspiracy as leverage to maybe get KR to turn on CT.  Now that she said she won't turn, and asks for a seperate trial, they will charge CT.  I still think that KR is mainly culpable for MJ's demise, tasing and injecting her.  But, and I say only maybe, at this point from my vantage point at this time, KR could turn on CT if his trial starts in January, and hers is pushed over to April, if it starts really looking bad for CT, she has nothin to lose.  I think KR's lawyer is doing a smart thing by separating the trials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have a funny feeling that as soon as KR gets her trial separated from CT&#8217;s trial, they will then tack on to CT the conspiracy.  I believe that they were using this potential conspiracy as leverage to maybe get KR to turn on CT.  Now that she said she won&#8217;t turn, and asks for a seperate trial, they will charge CT.  I still think that KR is mainly culpable for MJ&#8217;s demise, tasing and injecting her.  But, and I say only maybe, at this point from my vantage point at this time, KR could turn on CT if his trial starts in January, and hers is pushed over to April, if it starts really looking bad for CT, she has nothin to lose.  I think KR&#8217;s lawyer is doing a smart thing by separating the trials.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Annonymous#2</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7666</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7666</guid>
					<description>Very valid reasonable points! There is a “Jason G” and chainsaw too that are making some strong points as well. 

I just don’t get this…court for Brady was yesterday and receives bail, though a high amount, he did receive it. But now the biggest question that comes to mind is the fact that Daskas said, “Brady is a danger to the community”, yet it had been reported by the LVMPD knowing about this “alleged plot” since May, 2006 yet they allowed him to “walk the streets” until October, 2006 (3 months before CT/KR trial date) and freed Cassim in June? What is that? If in fact he were such a danger, and the last reported activity was in May, why did it take so long to arrest him? If I remember correctly, that was one of Glen P’s first comments.

True enough, the DA must have something on Brady, but why don’t these pieces to the puzzle fit together?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Very valid reasonable points! There is a “Jason G” and chainsaw too that are making some strong points as well. </p>
	<p>I just don’t get this…court for Brady was yesterday and receives bail, though a high amount, he did receive it. But now the biggest question that comes to mind is the fact that Daskas said, “Brady is a danger to the community”, yet it had been reported by the LVMPD knowing about this “alleged plot” since May, 2006 yet they allowed him to “walk the streets” until October, 2006 (3 months before CT/KR trial date) and freed Cassim in June? What is that? If in fact he were such a danger, and the last reported activity was in May, why did it take so long to arrest him? If I remember correctly, that was one of Glen P’s first comments.</p>
	<p>True enough, the DA must have something on Brady, but why don’t these pieces to the puzzle fit together?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Jason G</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7655</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7655</guid>
					<description>I too believe that the DA will &quot;tag&quot; the murder for hire charges onto Titus. I, however believe that it will be to cloud the issues in an overall attempt to cover a set up from the get go. Many pieces to this puzzel do not yet fit. Additionally, I am very suspicious of the timing, MARCH through MAY to finally get Brady to cough up $1,500 and then an OCTOBER arrest. 

By the way, I am very pro law enforcement and personally believe that 99.9% of the police and DA's are good, honest people like most of us. Something is not right about this alledged &quot;plot&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I too believe that the DA will &#8220;tag&#8221; the murder for hire charges onto Titus. I, however believe that it will be to cloud the issues in an overall attempt to cover a set up from the get go. Many pieces to this puzzel do not yet fit. Additionally, I am very suspicious of the timing, MARCH through MAY to finally get Brady to cough up $1,500 and then an OCTOBER arrest. </p>
	<p>By the way, I am very pro law enforcement and personally believe that 99.9% of the police and DA&#8217;s are good, honest people like most of us. Something is not right about this alledged &#8220;plot&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: darkstar</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7603</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7603</guid>
					<description>Chain,

First, Titus wasnt that smart, nor Brady either, to set up a hit and not get caught...Brady has been busted on it, and we will see if CT gets tagged with it as well. 

As far as the murder of MJ, Id have to think the DA thinks those charges are pretty solid. The conspiracy to murder is a whole different issue and doesnt tie into the MJ murder except to reflect poorly on CT...that is, why would CT want to illiminate witnesses against him on the murder if he didnt do it?

Like I say, Im not much of a gambler, but Im still betting CT gets the conspiracy tacked on at some point.

d*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chain,</p>
	<p>First, Titus wasnt that smart, nor Brady either, to set up a hit and not get caught&#8230;Brady has been busted on it, and we will see if CT gets tagged with it as well. </p>
	<p>As far as the murder of MJ, Id have to think the DA thinks those charges are pretty solid. The conspiracy to murder is a whole different issue and doesnt tie into the MJ murder except to reflect poorly on CT&#8230;that is, why would CT want to illiminate witnesses against him on the murder if he didnt do it?</p>
	<p>Like I say, Im not much of a gambler, but Im still betting CT gets the conspiracy tacked on at some point.</p>
	<p>d*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: chainsaw</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7576</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7576</guid>
					<description>Jason G makes some very good points.  Titus was either smart enough to set up a hit and not get caught, or the DA did, even if it is legas to hire jailhouse snitches, overstepped their authority.  One more point, if the DA can't even prove titus's envolvement WITH AN AUDIO recording and all the evidence they supposedly have for the hit.  How the Hek is he gonna prove MJ was murdered and not just dead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jason G makes some very good points.  Titus was either smart enough to set up a hit and not get caught, or the DA did, even if it is legas to hire jailhouse snitches, overstepped their authority.  One more point, if the DA can&#8217;t even prove titus&#8217;s envolvement WITH AN AUDIO recording and all the evidence they supposedly have for the hit.  How the Hek is he gonna prove MJ was murdered and not just dead!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: darkstar</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7553</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7553</guid>
					<description>Jason,

I think it is just showboating by both Saggese and the DA. That crap will stop when they get into court and the trial begins.

First, you are thinking like a normal person!! Thats not a critisism, as if I even had to tell you...

Crooks are by their nature unreliable. Brady was likely scoping out the meetings from a distance to see who showed up on the other side...they also dont have a sense of time like normal people...they work on a perp calendar...minute to minute, day to day, whatever...by the same token, the mechanisms of law enforcement move slowly and often inexplicably as well...the DA isnt under too much pressure to hurry up and tack on the conspiracy charges onto CT...The DA could be just sitting back, dangling it over the various perps heads, seeing who might want a bite at the &quot;you scratch my back I scratch your back&quot; apple...

As for the 50,000 dollars, well, all I can think of is they had champagne taste on a beer budget...these are small time wannabee crooks. Not too smart, either...

d*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jason,</p>
	<p>I think it is just showboating by both Saggese and the DA. That crap will stop when they get into court and the trial begins.</p>
	<p>First, you are thinking like a normal person!! Thats not a critisism, as if I even had to tell you&#8230;</p>
	<p>Crooks are by their nature unreliable. Brady was likely scoping out the meetings from a distance to see who showed up on the other side&#8230;they also dont have a sense of time like normal people&#8230;they work on a perp calendar&#8230;minute to minute, day to day, whatever&#8230;by the same token, the mechanisms of law enforcement move slowly and often inexplicably as well&#8230;the DA isnt under too much pressure to hurry up and tack on the conspiracy charges onto CT&#8230;The DA could be just sitting back, dangling it over the various perps heads, seeing who might want a bite at the &#8220;you scratch my back I scratch your back&#8221; apple&#8230;</p>
	<p>As for the 50,000 dollars, well, all I can think of is they had champagne taste on a beer budget&#8230;these are small time wannabee crooks. Not too smart, either&#8230;</p>
	<p>d*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Jason G</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7541</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7541</guid>
					<description>(Please excuse any duplicate messages) 
To continue, It was reported that Brady &quot;was released from jail in early MARCH&quot;. &quot;In APRIL, Brady failed to show up to 2 (or 3) meetings&quot; (with undercover) which had been set-up by informent, Cassim. Now why would a person who is supposed to be arranging the murder of witnesses &quot;fail to show at these meetings?&quot; The &quot;hit&quot; was to origionally cost $50,000. Why did Brady only give undercover officers $1,500? and not until two (2) mettings in MAY? And, why did it take from MAY 19th until OCTOBER 19th or 20th to make the arrest on Brady?

Further, I believe that something is seriously wrong with hedlines such as &quot;Prosecutor alleges link--&quot; after DA Daskas tells the District court Judge Jackie Glass, (the Titus murder trial Judge), &quot;there's this plot to kill Mr. Gross by one of his co-defendants, Craig Titus. Could it be that Marc Saggese, Titus's attorney, is on to something when he says, &quot;Titus was the victum of a set-up? Is it possiable that this whole murder for hire plot is a set-up? Who stands to gain the most from such news headlines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>(Please excuse any duplicate messages)<br />
To continue, It was reported that Brady &#8220;was released from jail in early MARCH&#8221;. &#8220;In APRIL, Brady failed to show up to 2 (or 3) meetings&#8221; (with undercover) which had been set-up by informent, Cassim. Now why would a person who is supposed to be arranging the murder of witnesses &#8220;fail to show at these meetings?&#8221; The &#8220;hit&#8221; was to origionally cost $50,000. Why did Brady only give undercover officers $1,500? and not until two (2) mettings in MAY? And, why did it take from MAY 19th until OCTOBER 19th or 20th to make the arrest on Brady?</p>
	<p>Further, I believe that something is seriously wrong with hedlines such as &#8220;Prosecutor alleges link&#8211;&#8221; after DA Daskas tells the District court Judge Jackie Glass, (the Titus murder trial Judge), &#8220;there&#8217;s this plot to kill Mr. Gross by one of his co-defendants, Craig Titus. Could it be that Marc Saggese, Titus&#8217;s attorney, is on to something when he says, &#8220;Titus was the victum of a set-up? Is it possiable that this whole murder for hire plot is a set-up? Who stands to gain the most from such news headlines?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Jason G</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7536</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7536</guid>
					<description>This case is becomming more convoluted by the day. Why hasen't the DA, Mr. Robert Daskas, charged Craig Titus with this &quot;alledged&quot; murder for hire plot? If Daskas doesn't charge Titus, I too would consider this &quot;grand standing&quot;. Additionally, this has the potential to scare witnesses into saying anything to protect themselves. According to news reports, Nelson Brady, Jr. was housed for only two weeks with Titus in FEBRUARY. In MARCH police &quot;DEVELOPED&quot; an informant by the name of Deem Cassim. Coincidently, MARCH is the same month Cassim had been sentenced by Judge Joseph Bonaventure to 3 - 12 years for &quot;armed rebery&quot; with a deadly wepon, (a gun). Then in JUNE, at the request of the DA office, (Daskas?), Judge Bonaventure &quot;re-sentenced&quot; Cassim to probation and Cassim was released back into the general population. Although this &quot;re-sentencing&quot; may be have been legal, I believe that there is much more to come with the Daskas/Bonaventure connection. I would be interested in hearing Judge Bonaventure's comments and reasoning for his actions relating to Cassim. 

If the news reports are even close to the true story, there are more questions than answers offered. These reports state that Brady spent two weeks housed with Titus in FEBRUARY. Where was Cassim during this time period? Was he or had he been housed with Titus and Brady? I have not seen it reported that there had been any contact between the informent, Cassim and Titus. Contact between Brady and Titus has been alledged, however, Titus is not yet charged? The big question, what does Brady have to gain from this &quot;alledged&quot; murder plot? Who does have anything to gain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This case is becomming more convoluted by the day. Why hasen&#8217;t the DA, Mr. Robert Daskas, charged Craig Titus with this &#8220;alledged&#8221; murder for hire plot? If Daskas doesn&#8217;t charge Titus, I too would consider this &#8220;grand standing&#8221;. Additionally, this has the potential to scare witnesses into saying anything to protect themselves. According to news reports, Nelson Brady, Jr. was housed for only two weeks with Titus in FEBRUARY. In MARCH police &#8220;DEVELOPED&#8221; an informant by the name of Deem Cassim. Coincidently, MARCH is the same month Cassim had been sentenced by Judge Joseph Bonaventure to 3 - 12 years for &#8220;armed rebery&#8221; with a deadly wepon, (a gun). Then in JUNE, at the request of the DA office, (Daskas?), Judge Bonaventure &#8220;re-sentenced&#8221; Cassim to probation and Cassim was released back into the general population. Although this &#8220;re-sentencing&#8221; may be have been legal, I believe that there is much more to come with the Daskas/Bonaventure connection. I would be interested in hearing Judge Bonaventure&#8217;s comments and reasoning for his actions relating to Cassim. </p>
	<p>If the news reports are even close to the true story, there are more questions than answers offered. These reports state that Brady spent two weeks housed with Titus in FEBRUARY. Where was Cassim during this time period? Was he or had he been housed with Titus and Brady? I have not seen it reported that there had been any contact between the informent, Cassim and Titus. Contact between Brady and Titus has been alledged, however, Titus is not yet charged? The big question, what does Brady have to gain from this &#8220;alledged&#8221; murder plot? Who does have anything to gain?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: chainsaw</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7522</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7522</guid>
					<description>I'm interested to see if anything happened in court today with Brady.  It might just have been a video appearance.  I've never seen that before, only in Vegas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m interested to see if anything happened in court today with Brady.  It might just have been a video appearance.  I&#8217;ve never seen that before, only in Vegas.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: darkstar</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7513</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7513</guid>
					<description>My guess is that if Brady doesnt &quot;flip&quot; on CT, the DA still has Brady for 3 counts of conspiracy to murder. They havent as of yet charged CT with it, and may not...in any case, the Brady case is separate from Titus anyway. 

The DA can still hammer on Brady for the conspiracy to murder regardless of whether they decide or not to tack it on to CT's list...

Who knows what the deal was that sprung Cassim...maybe the DA figures that an attempted robbery is not as serious as a murder, and if Cassim can help nail a murderer, then it is worth it...Im guessing, but even if Cassim had a 12 year sentence for attempted rob, my guess is that it would be probably cut in half or even more for good behavior, overcrowding, blah, blah, blah...so he may have gotten out early anyway...

But it still sounds like the gift of all gifts to that creepy Cassim...no doubt there are some serious strings attached to his freedom...I dont think he would have got the deal if he didnt have some bulletproof testimony to give against CT...

But, we will see....this is going to get interesting real quick...

d*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My guess is that if Brady doesnt &#8220;flip&#8221; on CT, the DA still has Brady for 3 counts of conspiracy to murder. They havent as of yet charged CT with it, and may not&#8230;in any case, the Brady case is separate from Titus anyway. </p>
	<p>The DA can still hammer on Brady for the conspiracy to murder regardless of whether they decide or not to tack it on to CT&#8217;s list&#8230;</p>
	<p>Who knows what the deal was that sprung Cassim&#8230;maybe the DA figures that an attempted robbery is not as serious as a murder, and if Cassim can help nail a murderer, then it is worth it&#8230;Im guessing, but even if Cassim had a 12 year sentence for attempted rob, my guess is that it would be probably cut in half or even more for good behavior, overcrowding, blah, blah, blah&#8230;so he may have gotten out early anyway&#8230;</p>
	<p>But it still sounds like the gift of all gifts to that creepy Cassim&#8230;no doubt there are some serious strings attached to his freedom&#8230;I dont think he would have got the deal if he didnt have some bulletproof testimony to give against CT&#8230;</p>
	<p>But, we will see&#8230;.this is going to get interesting real quick&#8230;</p>
	<p>d*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Annonymous#2</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7489</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7489</guid>
					<description>I agree 100%...Thank you for your comment, I truly appreciate that. Today is court so I guess we'll see...
Thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree 100%&#8230;Thank you for your comment, I truly appreciate that. Today is court so I guess we&#8217;ll see&#8230;<br />
Thanks again
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Chainsaw</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7487</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7487</guid>
					<description>Anonymous #2

There are numerous comments here about them releasing Casim.  I think that it does show how here in las vegas, anything goes.  I don't think anyone would have been set free if this was los angeles.  I mean, set free on a 12 year stint?  Come on, there is somthing fishy here. 

There are many comments to how I say that Las Vegas in Corrupt.   And this take's cake.  How many people have heard of this happening before.  I mean set free?  maybe cut the sentance down.  I heard that jailhouse snitches are a dime a dozen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Anonymous #2</p>
	<p>There are numerous comments here about them releasing Casim.  I think that it does show how here in las vegas, anything goes.  I don&#8217;t think anyone would have been set free if this was los angeles.  I mean, set free on a 12 year stint?  Come on, there is somthing fishy here. </p>
	<p>There are many comments to how I say that Las Vegas in Corrupt.   And this take&#8217;s cake.  How many people have heard of this happening before.  I mean set free?  maybe cut the sentance down.  I heard that jailhouse snitches are a dime a dozen.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on BODYBUILDER CASE: Informant gets reduced sentence by: Annonymous#2</title>
		<link>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7470</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.titusandryan.com/2006/11/21/bodybuilder-case-informant-gets-reduced-sentence/#comment-7470</guid>
					<description>Disregard...this is the same comment
How about this…I must say this is a very interseting forum with alot of good, valid substantial points.
What is going to happen to the city of Las Vegas to include the District Attorney’s office, and even the LVMPD for that matter when the evidence will show that Deem Cassim was “released” from jail with a 12 year sentence on his back in June, setting him completely free with probation? CT does have a damn good attorney, and he did say “he’s never seen this happen before”. The question would be, did the DA’s office do this because they didn’t have enough information on CT, so they had to go out of their way for the “snitch”? Undoubtabley, they are trying to use Brady to get to CT, but Im going to pretend say that I am 110% positive that this won’t happen, so then what? Brady too has one of the best attorney’s in the city, so what if this just all falls back in the DA’s lap?
I am honestly just seeking opinions, not trying to light a fire here, but I just have one question for this forum and honestly seeking intellegnt opinions. Lets just “pretend” that Brady doesn’t “flip” on CT as the DA’s office, media, etc. is hoping/saying he will. And, that being said, Brady fights this to the end, what about the damage it would do to the LVMPD for CT’s trial? I won’t state my opinion because again, I am not trying to start a fire, but wouldn’t that make it just that much more clear that they don’t have the evidence against CT?
What if, just by chance, they don’t have enough evidence against Brady and again we’ll just pretend that this is a fact, what do you think will happen to this case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Disregard&#8230;this is the same comment<br />
How about this…I must say this is a very interseting forum with alot of good, valid substantial points.<br />
What is going to happen to the city of Las Vegas to include the District Attorney’s office, and even the LVMPD for that matter when the evidence will show that Deem Cassim was “released” from jail with a 12 year sentence on his back in June, setting him completely free with probation? CT does have a damn good attorney, and he did say “he’s never seen this happen before”. The question would be, did the DA’s office do this because they didn’t have enough information on CT, so they had to go out of their way for the “snitch”? Undoubtabley, they are trying to use Brady to get to CT, but Im going to pretend say that I am 110% positive that this won’t happen, so then what? Brady too has one of the best attorney’s in the city, so what if this just all falls back in the DA’s lap?<br />
I am honestly just seeking opinions, not trying to light a fire here, but I just have one question for this forum and honestly seeking intellegnt opinions. Lets just “pretend” that Brady doesn’t “flip” on CT as the DA’s office, media, etc. is hoping/saying he will. And, that being said, Brady fights this to the end, what about the damage it would do to the LVMPD for CT’s trial? I won’t state my opinion because again, I am not trying to start a fire, but wouldn’t that make it just that much more clear that they don’t have the evidence against CT?<br />
What if, just by chance, they don’t have enough evidence against Brady and again we’ll just pretend that this is a fact, what do you think will happen to this case?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

